WebDemocratic Alliance v The Acting National Director of Public Prosecutions (288/11) 2012 ZASCA 15 (20 March 2012) Glenister v President of the Republic of South Africa 2011 3 SA 347 (CC) National Director of Public Prosecutions v Zuma 2009 2 SA 277 (SCA) S v Shaik 2007 1 SACR 142 (D) S v Shaik 2007 1 SA 240 (SCA) S v Shaik 2008 2 SA 208 (CC) Web19 It is important not to label the decision whether to admit hearsay evidence in the interests of justice in terms of sec 3 of Act 45 of 1988 as an exercise of ëdiscretioní, if only to avoid hyper-deference on appeal. See in this regard S v Ndhlovu 2002 6 SA 305 (SCA) para 22 and S v Shaik & Others 2007 1 SA 240 (SCA) para 170.
Iv the reason why the evidence is not given by the - Course Hero
WebS v Shaik and Others: 26 February 2008: 29 May 2008: O'Regan [2008] ZACC 8: Nyathi v MEC for Health, Gauteng and Another: 30 August 2007: 2 June 2008: Madala [2008] ZACC 9: Shilubana and Others v Nwamitwa: 27 November 2007: 4 June 2008: Van der Westhuizen [2008] ZACC 10: Merafong Demarcation Forum and Others v President of … WebFurthermore, the scenario at hand is very similar to that in S v Shaik 2007 (1) ... In S v Shaik. There are 3 requirements , which have to be met when opinion evidence is at … b7 ハイコード
Banda v state 1990 v2 SA - Case law - 269 THE FLIGHT FROM …
Webpublication of an offender’s conviction, sentence and the details of the offence to individuals or a group of persons (such as shareholders). An adverse publication damages the corporate offender’s reputation – a valuable asset to a corporate entity. It therefore serves the purpose of corporate deterrence. In this WebS v Shaik 2007 (1) SACR 247 (SCA). S v Ndhlovu 2002 2 SACR 325 (SCA). S V M 2002 2 SACR 411 (SCA). Textbooks Schwikkard P & Van Der Merwe S. E Principles of … Web[8] In S v Shaik 2007 (1) SA 247 (SCA) the SCA stated at paragraph 223 that: ‘The seriousness of the offence of corruption cannot be overemphasised. . . . It lowers the … 千葉県 インフルエンザ 感染者数